Catastrophic injury cases require early investigation and a real damages strategy.
Severe harm requires proof of responsibility and a disciplined record of medical needs, future care, work impact, family impact, and available recovery sources.

Why this cannot sit on a shelf.
The injury changed what the next thirty years look like. Care, work, housing, and family roles all shifted at once, and decisions are being asked of you now.
- Future care, equipment, and home access needs have to be documented as they develop.
- Physical evidence such as a vehicle, machine, or product can be repaired or scrapped quickly.
- More than one insurance layer or responsible organization may exist, and each has its own process.
Start with a fact pattern, not a conclusion.
A page cannot decide whether a claim exists. These are the kinds of facts that help the firm decide whether a closer review is appropriate.
A responsible person or organization and liability theory can be investigated
Coverage, assets, or another realistic recovery source may exist
Keep the records that make the chronology testable.
Acute-care, specialist, rehabilitation, imaging, and prognosis records
Preserve the original, note where it came from, and keep a simple date index. Do not send sensitive records through a public form.
Work history, care needs, home changes, family observations, and daily-impact notes
Preserve the original, note where it came from, and keep a simple date index. Do not send sensitive records through a public form.
Incident proof, product or vehicle information, insurance layers, and witness details
Preserve the original, note where it came from, and keep a simple date index. Do not send sensitive records through a public form.
How the first review tests the matter.
Medical causation, severity, prognosis, and future-care needs
The weight of this factor depends on the complete facts, available law, and recoverable proof.
Life-care, vocational, earnings, household, and noneconomic impact
The weight of this factor depends on the complete facts, available law, and recoverable proof.
Fault, defendant profile, insurance layers, expert needs, and litigation leverage
The weight of this factor depends on the complete facts, available law, and recoverable proof.
Deadlines vary by claim, party, forum, and facts. This page does not calculate a filing or notice deadline. If timing may matter, call promptly.
Open the related preparation guideWhat the first review actually does.
- Conflicts and parties first
Everyone on every side is identified before a closer review, because a conflict controls whether the firm can look at the matter at all.
- A timing screen, not a deadline calculation
Known dates, notices, and procedural steps are reviewed against your facts. No web page and no first call can promise you a filing date.
- A preservation list
What may disappear first is identified early, including records held by an employer, an insurer, an agency, or a company.
- A next step you can act on
Engagement discussion, a request for specific information, a referral, co-counsel review, or a decline. No acceptance, outcome, or response time is promised.
Catastrophic Injury questions.
The person injured cannot manage the claim. Who can call?
A spouse, parent, adult child, or another person close to the situation can describe what happened and what is needed. Authority to act for an injured adult is a separate legal question that is addressed during the review.
What should the family be recording right now?
Keep a simple dated journal of care hours, missed work, equipment purchased, home modifications, appointments, and daily limitations. Contemporaneous notes made now are more useful than a reconstruction attempted months later.
Why does a catastrophic case need investigation so early?
Vehicles get repaired, machines get returned to service, products get discarded, and scenes get restored. Once the physical evidence is gone, the case depends on whatever record already exists.
Send a short chronology and the parties involved.
The firm may accept, refer, co-counsel, or decline a matter after conflicts and fit review. Contact alone is not representation.
