Personal Injury and Wrongful Death
The first review connects responsibility, medical proof, life impact, available coverage, and any preservation or deadline issue.
Read morePractice areas
Find the right review path for a serious California civil matter.
Different problems require different proof. Every first review still asks the same four questions: timing, responsibility, harm, and a realistic recovery source.
Client problem index
Choose the page closest to your facts.
Employment and Workplace Claims
A useful employment screen starts with what happened, when it happened, who knew, what was reported, and what changed afterward.
Read moreCivil Rights and Government Accountability
Early review can matter when a public entity, government actor, video record, or special notice process may be involved.
Read moreConsumer Protection and Lemon Law
The first review focuses on the transaction, what was promised, repair or complaint history, notices, measurable loss, and the responsible business.
Read moreInsurance Bad Faith
The policy, complete claim chronology, insurer communications, underlying loss, and resulting harm anchor the first screen.
Read moreCatastrophic Injury
Severe harm requires proof of responsibility and a disciplined record of medical needs, future care, work impact, family impact, and available recovery sources.
Read moreSelect Civil Litigation
The first screen tests documented wrongdoing, provable damages, timing, forum, collectability, and whether the fee structure fits the work required.
Read moreMay fit.
Specific conduct, documented harm, identifiable parties, usable evidence, and a viable recovery path support closer review.
May not fit.
Minor or undocumented harm, no identifiable responsible party, no practical recovery source, or a mismatch with the firm may lead to referral or decline.
Act promptly when a deadline, government entity, disappearing evidence, release, claim notice, or pending agency process may be involved.