Workplace claims need a clean timeline, documents, and deadline review.
A useful employment screen starts with what happened, when it happened, who knew, what was reported, and what changed afterward.

Start with a fact pattern, not a conclusion.
A page cannot decide whether a claim exists. These are the kinds of facts that help the firm decide whether a closer review is appropriate.
The employer and relevant decision-makers can be identified
The chronology and resulting harm can be documented
Keep the records that make the chronology testable.
Offer letters, policies, reviews, schedules, pay records, and personnel documents
Preserve the original, note where it came from, and keep a simple date index. Do not send sensitive records through a public form.
Emails, texts, complaints, notices, and agency correspondence
Preserve the original, note where it came from, and keep a simple date index. Do not send sensitive records through a public form.
A date-by-date chronology of reports, responses, and adverse actions
Preserve the original, note where it came from, and keep a simple date index. Do not send sensitive records through a public form.
How the first review tests the matter.
Protected activity or status and the employer's stated reasons
The weight of this factor depends on the complete facts, available law, and recoverable proof.
Administrative or filing deadlines that may apply
The weight of this factor depends on the complete facts, available law, and recoverable proof.
Lost compensation, other damages, proof quality, and practical leverage
The weight of this factor depends on the complete facts, available law, and recoverable proof.
Deadlines vary by claim, party, forum, and facts. This page does not calculate a filing or notice deadline. If timing may matter, call promptly.
Open the related preparation guideSend a short chronology and the parties involved.
The firm may accept, refer, co-counsel, or decline a matter after conflicts and fit review. Contact alone is not representation.
